Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2004 November
2004 January
2003 December
My Links
juniperflux
cutter
bob martin
L
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
| raw. |
| 10.27.06 (12:22 am) [edit] |
|
posted by: akelso (reply)
post date: 10.26.06 (6:23 pm)
Amazing - this fetus/newborn actually looks quite healthy.
One wonders what truly provokes the first lusty cry?
Is it a way to clear lungs of nine months underwater -
or rather, an emphatic protest against modern humanity's
mindless absence of civilization ...
Til now I always suspected the former.
On further reflection, the latter's obviously the case.
posted by: fractalmom (reply)
post date: 10.26.06 (7:17 pm)
dude. i would buy this one and hang it on my wall.
nuff said
posted by: seochris (reply)
post date: 10.26.06 (10:57 pm)
but this is a sort of injustice
posted by: lorischuster (reply)
post date: 10.27.06 (2:32 pm)
phenomenal.
posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 10.28.06 (6:23 am)
Indeed...
Deadly; Not Amazing.
posted by: 69whisper (reply)
post date: 10.30.06 (12:16 pm)
Reply to: akelso
Angel's Cry
posted by: thejongleur (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:13 pm)
Reply to: akelso
"Til now I always suspected the former.
On further reflection, the latter's obviously the case. "
That seems to be the rather distressing truth about that moment.
Thank you for reflecting here.
ams
posted by: thejongleur (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:15 pm)
Reply to: fractalmom
I consider that quite an endorsement.
Thank you, Dawn.
ams
posted by: thejongleur (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:16 pm)
Reply to: seochris
Are there more thoughts to come?
ams
posted by: thejongleur (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:18 pm)
Reply to: lorischuster
*smile*
It's good to have you here.
Thank you.
ams
posted by: thejongleur (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:20 pm)
Reply to: Cutter
hmm.. I'd like to ask for more thoughts, but perhaps that would be greedy of me.
ams
posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (3:32 pm)
;)
"Deadly; Not Amazing." D N A
Depending on one's perspective, turning people into bunches of chromosomes? I don't know... might not be too much of a good thing to force "nature" to conform to our wants, like we seem to be trying to do.
We may well end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater. (so to speak)
posted by: akelso (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (5:12 pm)
Reply to: 69whisper
I'll have to be more attentive to the cries of angels, Whisper. No doubt I hear them all the time - but how often do I recognize their identity??
posted by: akelso (reply)
post date: 10.31.06 (5:22 pm)
Reply to: Cutter
Cutter, it's helpful to have your clarification! From MICRO-analysis, I absolutely agree (DNA's micro, right?) However at the MACRO level, I'm betting on the resilience of the infant - just LOOK how strong and healthy is that kid's presentation. An APGAR score just looking at this image from my estimation is 8 of 10, (if I could count the newborn's heart-rate s/he might have 2more points ...)
With or without intention it seems that thejongleur has presented us with an infant messiah!!